Korean J. Math. Vol. 27 No. 1 (2019) pp.17-51
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11568/kjm.2019.27.1.17

Slowly changing function oriented growth measurement of differential polynomial and differential monomial

Main Article Content

Tanmay Biswas


In the paper we establish some new results depending on the comparative growth properties of composite entire and meromorphic functions using relative $_{p}L^{\ast }$-order, relative $_{p}L^{\ast }$-lower order and differential monomials, differential polynomials generated by one of the factors.

Article Details


[1] N. Bhattacharjee and I. Lahiri, Growth and value distribution of differential polynomials, Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Roum., Nouv. S er. 39 (1996), 85-104. Google Scholar

[2] T. Biswas, Comparative growth measurement of differential monomials and dif- ferential polynomials depending upon their relative pL∗-types and relative pL∗-weak types, Aligarh Bull. Math. 36 (2017), 73–94. Google Scholar

[3] T. Biswas, Comparative growth analysis of differential monomials and differential polynomials depending on their relative pL∗-orders, J. Chungcheong Math. Soc. 31 (2018), 103–130. Google Scholar

[4] T. Biswas, Advancement on the study of growth analysis of differential polynomial and differential monomial in the light of slowly increasing functions, Carpathian Math. Publ. 10 (2018), 31–57. Google Scholar

[5] W. Bergweiler, On the Nevanlinna Characteristic of a composite function, Com- plex Variables Theory Appl. 10 (1988), 225–236. Google Scholar

[6] L. Bernal, Orden relative de crecimiento de funciones enteras, Collect. Math., 39 (1988), 209–229. Google Scholar

[7] W. Doeringer, Exceptional values of differential polynomials, Pacific J. Math., 98 (1982), 55–62. Google Scholar

[8] S. K. Datta, T. Biswas and C. Biswas, Measure of growth ratios of composite entire and meromorphic functions with a focus on relative order, Int. J. Math. Sci. Eng. Appl. 8 (2014), 207–218. Google Scholar

[9] W.K. Hayman, Meromorphic Functions, The Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1964. Google Scholar

[10] I. Lahiri, Deficiencies of differential polynomials, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math.,30 (1999), 435–447. Google Scholar

[11] I. Laine, Nevanlinna Theory and Complex Differential Equations. De Gruyter, Berlin, 1993. Google Scholar

[12] B. K. Lahiri and D. Banerjee, Relative order of entire and meromorphic functions, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India Ser. A., 69(A) (1999), 339–354. Google Scholar

[13] K. Niino and C.C. Yang, Some growth relationships on factors of two composite entire functions, Factorization theory of meromorphic functions and related topics, Marcel Dekker, Inc.(New York and Basel), 1982, 95-99. Google Scholar

[14] D. Somasundaram and R. Thamizharasi, A note on the entire functions of L-bounded index and L-type, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 19 (1988), 284–293. Google Scholar

[15] L.R. Sons, Deficiencies of monomials, Math.Z, 111 (1969), 53–68. Google Scholar

[16] G. Valiron, Lectures on the general theory of integral functions, Chelsea Publishing Company, 1949. Google Scholar

[17] L. Yang, Value distribution theory and new research on it, Science Press, Beijing, 1982. Google Scholar

[18] H. X. Yi, On a result of Singh, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc., 41 (1990), 417–420. Google Scholar

[19] C. C. Yang and H. X. Yi, Uniqueness theory of meromorphic functions, Mathematics and its Applications, 557. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 2003. Google Scholar

[20] L. Yang, Value distribution theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993. Google Scholar